PCS Broad Left Network

Since the invasion by the Israeli armed forces on 27 October, the situation for civilians in the Gaza Strip has sharply deteriorated.

At least 22,000 people have been killed by Israeli forces, including over 7,000 children, and this figure is likely too low; thousands more are listed as missing and organisations including the Gaza Health Ministry have cited major difficulties posed by the siege and hostilities in rendering medical aid to casualties and identifying the number of dead.

In addition to being cut off from basic supplies including food and electricity, civilians have been subjected to countless IDF air strikes, including those confirmed by the United Nations on schools and hospitals.

The longer this situation persists, disrupting aid to Palestinian civilians, the more people will die – and it is significant that the families of those Israelis kidnapped by Hamas marched on the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, on 13 December to demand that their government get back to the negotiating table. It is ever more apparent that bombing will not rescue the kidnapped.

Major UK demonstrations for peace continue

Around the world, millions of working class people have erupted into anger at the murderous actions of the Israeli state, provoking demonstrations. The vast majority have no sympathy with Hamas, but are outraged by the killings and destruction of communities in Gaza and understand that – contrary to the views of warmongers like Netanyahu – Hamas cannot be beaten by armed force any more than the US could ultimately defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan.

In the UK in many cities and on almost every weekend since the invasion, there have been major demonstrations, many joined by UK-born Palestinians and the families of those who live in Gaza, who have tried to get their families out, or who have not been able to contact their families. Broad Left Network (BLN) supporters in PCS have supported all of these.

At a recent demonstration in London, PCS members asked union reps what else their union can do to force an end to the conflict, and to support members with family caught up in the crisis.

The political power of these demonstrations cannot be underestimated. Netanyahu himself has publicly spoken about the need to reverse their impact. A massive backlash as the horrors of the invasion were exposed, aided by the demonstrations in putting forward the clear demand for a ceasefire helped secure a truce from 23 November until 1 December.

Most unions, including PCS, have published statements calling for an end to hostilities, and leaders have spoken on major demonstrations to call for the same. Unions in general can and should go much further, however, to mobilise the power of labour to force an end to the conflict, particularly given the role of PCS as the largest trade union in the UK Civil Service.

Build mass opposition to the conflict

Several PCS branches and groups have been proactive in encouraging union members to join weekly demonstrations in London, called under the auspices of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. This is a good first step to building support for the demands for a ceasefire and a wider political settlement that would allow for a sustained peace, and could be widened to other parts of the UK.

It is with surprise, therefore, that supporters of the BLN on the PCS National Executive Committee found themselves outvoted by the majority of the union’s NEC on exactly this question. The NEC majority under President (now also General Secretary-elect Fran Heathcote) voted against a proposal by Asst General Secretary John Moloney to work to broaden out these demos across the UK.

The union’s NEC met on 6/7 December. In their deliberations, the majority Democracy Alliance grouping opposed further regional demonstrations, opposed a donation to the International Transport Workers Federation (ITF) appeal to support international unions’ efforts to get medical supplies and food in to Gaza.

Democracy Alliance members of the PCS National Executive further opposed a proposal to hold a national lunch time online meeting to publicise the union’s position on the Gaza conflict. This national meeting was intended to have a Palestine Solidarity Campaign speaker, to help people understand what has been going on and what they can do to help force an end to the invasion.

At the NEC meeting, the question of a small number of resignations from the union over the Gaza statement was raised as a reason not to do more for Gaza.

Branch reps who work alongside BLN supporters in building the union have told us that a very small number of resignation letters have been received denouncing the union for “supporting Hamas”, which is simply not true.

Overall we believe the number to be several dozen. Any time the union takes a strong position on questions that matter to workers, a small number of people will not like it and will prefer to resign from the union to engaging with the union’s democratic processes, including members’ meetings that have been called by branches to discuss participation in demonstrations etc.

This is not a reason to shrink from a robust defence of the lives of Palestinians facing the destruction of their homes, communities and lives.

We call on the union’s NEC to reverse their position, to agree the donation to the ITF appeal, to agree to organise workplace and city or town based demonstrations in concert with other arms of the labour movement and national campaign organisations such as Stop the War Coalition, to call for a ceasefire, and to organise a national PCS meeting to explain the union’s position and what members can do, with a speaker from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

Our union, in particular, must be more proactive in ensuring that civil servants are protected from the government’s attempts to politicise civil service workplaces by projecting the Israeli flag on to buildings, and from any activity which may be in breach of UK or international law, including having any role in the transfer of weapons to a state that is clearly attacking civilians.

Much more than this, we need to work across the entire labour movement to increase the numbers on demonstrations, to call for a ceasefire and an enduring solution that permanently ends the siege of Gaza, for mass struggle of Palestinians for liberation, for international links to be built with the Israeli and Palestinian working class and trade unions, and for an independent socialist Palestine.

Trade unions, the largest membership-based organisations in the UK, and representatives of the “sleeping superpower”, the working class, have a crucial role to play in this, and should name the day for a national day of action – following the example of school and college students – for workers to unite on the streets in protest at our government standing by while Gazans are slaughtered.

This requires national coordination across all trade unions, especially given the propensity of senior ministers in government to talk in extreme terms about banning demonstrations and using force against demonstrators. PCS could take this up with the UK Trade Union Congress (TUC). The defence of any group of workers in the UK who strike to block arms to Israel must also be raised.

Escalate political opposition to the war

We also need an organised political opposition to the Israeli armed offensive, including opposition to the UK supplying arms to Israel, and in favour of the provision of humanitarian aid to all those who need it. Keir Starmer’s early adoption of a pro-Israeli stance that ignored breaches of international and humanitarian law shows clearly that the Labour leadership are unwilling to play this role.

The result has been dozens of elected councillors resigning from the Labour Party in protest at the failure of the leadership to prioritise the lives of Palestinians over Starmer’s continued posture of total submission to the foreign policy imperatives of the USA, the biggest foreign backer of the Israeli invasion, which vetoed a UN resolution calling for a ceasefire.

Trade unions could convene an open meeting under a “Stop the War” umbrella, drawing together all socialist political forces, including MPs and councillors who have called for solidarity with Palestine and who oppose the invasion, to organise political opposition, to raise the profile of and pressure exerted by those calling for peace, including defence of workers who act to halt arms exports.

Civil servants are politically impartial, we serve the government of the day, but we are also citizens, and recognise that our own safety and security lies in international working class solidarity. We put no trust in the government to have our interests at heart, and will fight through our unions for a just and lasting peace and against the profiteering war machines of any nation.

On Thursday 14 December, the results in the PCS General Secretary and Assistant General Secretary elections were published. Candidate of the bureaucracy Fran Heathcote scraped a win as General Secretary with 10,340 (5.94% of total voters or 51.5% of votes cast compared to 9,557 for Marion Lloyd, the Broad Left Network’s candidate for General Secretary.

In very welcome news, left Assistant General Secretary, incumbent John Moloney, decisively defeated unelected union full time officer Paul O’Connor, 11,705 votes to 8,152. John is one of the leaders of PCS Independent Left, who campaigned hard alongside PCS Broad Left Network to secure a leadership that will reinvigorate the union’s national campaigns and lay democracy.

Hundreds of left activists and reps across the union mobilised to secure branch nominations, with Marion and John securing 80 and 87 branch nominations, accounting for more than 55,000 members, about 5,000 more than Heathcote. Work then began on leafleting, desk dropping, emailing and speaking face to face with tens of thousands of members across PCS.

Despite a very narrow loss in the General Secretary race, this work has firmly laid a basis for the growth of the left in PCS. 

As we move into the year of a UK General Election year, a wave of attacks on pay, jobs and terms and conditions is all but inevitable, with Labour prioritising credibility in front of financial markets and the bosses, to securing gains for workers, especially in the public sector. Resisting these attacks requires a capable, combative leadership with a strategy that can win.

Our work in the last few years, in strike ballot after strike ballot, on pickets and now in union elections is bringing it home to members that Broad Left Network activists can be that leadership.

This will be a tough hill to climb, given how many of our members are very angry with the union; 4,000 fewer of whom voted in these elections than in 2019 because they are losing faith that things can change, and thousands of whom are leaving PCS thanks to incompetent national leadership. Nevertheless, as the last four years have demonstrated, we are in this to win.

What a difference four years makes

Four years ago in 2019, the picture looked different. Previous General Secretary Mark Serwotka had acted with a cabal inside a united group inside PCS Left Unity to undermine and oust elected left Assistant General Secretary Chris Baugh. Serwotka then won the battle for branch nominations and went on to win re-election against two other candidates, including Marion.

In the space of four years, the Broad Left Network has been founded and grown dramatically, securing seats on the union’s National Executive every year since, as well as seats on multiple group executive committees. Hundreds have joined BLN to fight for union democracy and for campaigns that will defeat the attacks raining down on us from the bosses.

Four years ago, IL stood against Chris Baugh for AGS and against Marion Lloyd for General Secretary. This year, on the basis of a principled alliance in the elections that put forward a united programme of union democracy and renewal of our union’s national campaign, IL and BLN were able to come together behind John and Marion for AGS and GS, and a united slate in 2023 NEC elections.

This bodes well for a realignment of the left in PCS.

Ruling “Left Unity” group is a hollow shell

Events during the GS and AGS election demonstrate the extent to which PCS Left Unity, once a powerful organising tool for socialists in the union, has become merely a vehicle for elections, propped up by the union’s machinery to promote candidates who won’t disrupt the increasing power of unelected full time officers who think they know best and who eschew accountability to members.

In Revenue and Customs group, the second largest employer-based bargaining unit in PCS, scores of Left Unity members have now resigned in protest at the lack of support for their group, and at the complacent and ineffective ways that Left Unity operates. More can be read elsewhere on this website and in the statement these reps published, which many BLN supporters also signed.

Others in HMRC, not themselves part of the initial tranche of reps resigning from PCS Left Unity, have also made very public their break with the ruling faction. Amongst these were Tracy Hylton and Hector Wesley, among the longest serving and most recognisable Black activists in the union, the latter being deputy president of the Revenue and Customs group and National Executive

During the 2023 GS and AGS elections, the Socialist Workers Party also split from the ruling Left Unity faction, after five years of their most high profile supporters giving loyal and uncritical support to the ruling faction. 

There are many reasons for the recent splits and resignations from LU but undoubtedly the most prominent is the pitiful leadership of the 2022/23 PCS strike wave, which took over a month to launch after the strike mandate was won in November 2022, and then promptly called off after the government offered a one-time, non-consolidated, pro-rata payment of £1,500 to civil servants instead of a proper pay offer.

As Left Unity increasingly becomes a vehicle for their supporters (and friends of the ruling cabal) to get jobs in PCS, separating themselves from the ordinary members of the union, so does its actual capacity to run an effective union diminish. Letting the Tories off the hook over our pay, pensions, and jobs in 2023 has been the clearest example of that yet – and inevitably more will follow.

Rebuild the Left in PCS – BLN Conference meets on 20 January 2024

BLN supporters are not letting grass grow under our feet. The elected steering committee has taken early decisions about contacting all groups opposed to Left Unity to discuss a united programme – of reasserting union democracy and rebuilding our national campaign – that could form the basis for a united slate in forthcoming April 2024 national and group elections in PCS.

This will be further discussed and voted upon at the BLN Conference on 20 January. This Conference will discuss and vote on the full programme in the form of motions on key topics like pay, pensions, jobs, office closures, terms and conditions like hybrid working and matters of international importance to the labour movement such as the Gaza invasion.

BLN supporters will then take this programme to their PCS branch Annual General Meetings in February and March to seek endorsement from members for these motions to be put forward to Group Conferences for each employer (DWP, HMRC, Home Office, Commercial sector etc) and to the union’s Annual Delegate Conference.

A fighting, democratic union with socialist policies is and remains the lodestone of the Broad Left Network, and we urge you to get involved by joining (which you can do online!), to attend the BLN conference, adding your voice to ours as we fight to build a union that is willing and able to protect our members in the workplace and which can win decisively on pay, pensions, jobs and rights.

Trans Day of Remembrance – Heledd Muir-McCann

(Pronounced /Hel-leth Myoor muh-Can/ or /ˈhɛleːð mjuːr məˈkan/)

Trans Day of Remembrance was started in 1999 by Gwendolyn Ann Smith to honour Rita Hester, a trans woman murdered the year prior. Each year on the 20^th November, vigils are held to remember the trans and non-binary people lost to murder or suicide. The list grows ever longer, with around 320 more added in 2023. These are only the deaths we are aware of. The people on this list illustrate a worrying trend, in which violence against our community has been rising and trans people of colour are especially affected; 94% of the names belonged to trans women or trans-feminine people, most of which were black. This is consistent with a stark rise in transgender hate crimes reported in England and Wales over the past decade. Both of these figures are only the ones that get reported, with many more going unrecorded.

It is a stressful time to live as a trans person, with even UN experts voicing their concern; independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity Victor Madrigal-Borloz visited the UK in May. In his statement, he remarked on the “toxic nature of the public debate surrounding sexual orientation and gender identity” was in part cultivated by “abusive rhetoric by politicians, the media and social commentators has trickled down to produce increasingly abusive and hateful speech against LGBT persons.”
We are not free of this discrimination in PCS either – Mark Serwotka has publicly announced his support for his wife’s organisation Women’s Place UK, a transphobic organisation that opposes the right for people to self-identify their legal gender without medical approval (already approved in 20 countries). Our leadership in the NEC has received censure at both 2019 and 2023 Annual Conference for its conduct relating to trans and wider LGBTQ+ issues; in a vote regarding removing PCS Proud of their semi-autonomous status, the NEC delayed the process with an unnecessary card vote, but over 70,000 votes opposed their motion. Most notorious were the antics surrounding Motion A50 in this year’s annual conference. A50 addressed the refusal of the NEC to accept PCS Proud’s nomination of a delegate for the TUC LGBT+ Committee. It was revealed the president of Left Unity had privately insisted her supporters filibuster a prior debate to stop others from being discussed, this motion included; despite these tactics, the motion managed to be discussed and was passed decisively.

To begin tackling the tragedy and injustice highlighted inTrans Day of Remembrance, we must have leadership in our union that is firmly behind all LGBTQ+ rights as they should be all other demographics of worker.

Many of us fear things shall only get worse, but I am certain in my belief that if the trans community and our allies keep making a concerted effort to resist the people and institutions facilitating this hateful environment, the future will begin to look brighter. The violence and healthcare crisisthat has taken so many lives will one day evaporate, and trans and gender diverse people will one day live without fear of violence. The list and all 320 additions this year serve as a stark reminder of our necessity to believe a better future is possible.

The PCS Broad Left Network stands in solidarity with all those marching and protesting both in the UK and globally, against the barbaric military assault by the Israeli Government against the Palestinians in Gaza and the increasing threat of a land invasion. 

The Israeli state has been carrying out unprecedented levels of airstrikes on the densely populated Gaza Strip ever since the appalling Hamas attacks on Israeli civilians. Nearly 7,000 are reported to have been killed so far, a third of whom are children. Over half the 2½ million population has been displaced. 

We condemn the Tory government for their support for the Israeli state’s war on Gaza, which is a murderous collective punishment of poor Palestinians for the attack by Hamas on October 7th, including the horrific killing of Israeli civilians. The likes of Sunak, Biden and the rest of Western capitalist imperialism would have us believe that this crisis started that day with these terrible events, ignoring decades of brutal Israeli state repression and occupation. 

Disgracefully, this vicious bombardment on Gaza has been backed by Starmer’s New Labour. Outrageously, its representatives who join demonstrations against the attack on Gaza have been threatened with disciplinary action. This is a far cry from when Jeremy Corbyn was Labour leader. Under his leadership, the Labour Manifesto for the last general election in 2019 committed an incoming government to “immediately suspend the sale of arms to Israel for arms used in violation of the human rights of Palestinian civilians”. It would also strive to “secure justice and accountability for breaches of human rights”, listing, as an example, “the illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip”. And it also promised that “a Labour government will immediately recognise the state of Palestine”. 

The many PCS members who have been marching against the slaughter in Gaza, particularly those with friends and relatives living in Gaza, would expect PCS to take the lead in the mobilisation of the trade union movement against this war. 

The unions should seek to build massive union blocs on the anti-war demonstrations. Our members increasingly understand that a Tory government of the rich, that has inflicted the cost of living squeeze on our incomes and is bringing yet more anti-union legislation to restrict our right to strike, is on the opposite class divide to us, both at home and abroad. 

PCS members will also be disgusted at Starmer’s slavish support for the international interests of imperialism and big business and will want the union to base its political strategy on backing only those politicians who support our policies and members, including on the picket lines. 

BLN believes that the whole union movement should act collectively to ensure that any workers who refuse to manufacture, transport armaments, or supply related services to Israel for the purpose of attacking the Palestinian people are defended from victimisation by their employer. This includes any PCS members. 

Marion Lloyd said: “This is a brutal attack on Gaza, one of the poorest areas of the world by a military power supported by the Western capitalist governments. But the Palestinians have a friend in the millions of ordinary people all over the world, many of whom are on the streets demonstrating. We in the BLN stand in solidarity against this brutal assault and for the national, political and economic liberation of the Palestinian people. As a socialist and internationalist, I support the common struggle of working people, both here, in the Middle East and globally, for a present and future free from war, oppression, want and exploitation.”

Marion Lloyd, Broad Left Network supporter and the candidate of the left in the forthcoming PCS General Secretary election, has secured 80 nominations. John Moloney, Independent Left supporter and the left’s candidate for PCS Assistant General Secretary, has secured a whopping 87 nominations.

Published yesterday, these figures demonstrate the huge support for Marion, for John and for a fighting, democratic PCS. Breakthroughs across the union – but particularly in Revenue and Customs Group – now mean Marion’s election and John’s re-election are a step closer.

Current PCS national president Fran Heathcote, who arrogantly assumed she would be crowned General Secretary, and in whose interest outgoing General Secretary tried to stitch up this year’s Annual Delegate Conference, secured 90 nominations.

This is a far cry from the 170 nominations that she boasted she would receive when the campaign began. Marion Lloyd has run an energetic and outward facing campaign, speaking to the concerns of ordinary members, and along the way defeating Heathcote in every branch where the two spoke.

Both Marion and John are standing on a platform of only taking their civil service wage – rejecting the current General Secretary wage of £103,100 and repaying the difference between the two into the PCS campaign fund.

Heathcote, on the other hand, could not make up her mind whether she was intending to take the full General Secretary salary. Asked about this at two separate hustings, she has been unable to give a clear answer.

Marion’s election platform is very straightforward. She has consistently argued that a determined PCS national campaign could do a lot better than the £1,500 non-consolidated, one-time payment extracted from the government in June, just before the NEC cancelled the entire campaign.

Added to the question of pay, in order to build the strongest campaign possible, must also be tied questions such as opposing the 66,000 job cuts announced by the Tory government, and defending civil service offices and local services across the UK – on which Heathcote has been abysmal.

In a significant boost to the Broad Left Network/Independent Left campaign, John Moloney secured 87 nominations, beating his opponent Paul O’Connor’s tally of 84. O’Connor, long-serving unelected PCS full time officer, bragged that Broad Left Network was “a busted flush” earlier this year.

All eyes now turn to efforts to get out the maximum vote. On a high turnout, it is absolutely clear that Marion and John will decisively win the General Secretary election. We urge all branches to draw up plans now for ensuring every member votes when the election begins on 9November.

Vote Marion Lloyd and John Moloney – candidates for change

Tory Party conference closed on 4 October 2023 with some nasty surprises for UK civil servants. Jeremy Hunt, Chancellor of the Exchequer, announced his intention to reduce the size of the civil service by 66,000 jobs. Promises of green jobs and levelling up were replaced by demands for greater productivity from the public sector, further attacks on strikers and the dumping of net zero carbon goals.

Civil service jobs stood at 489,000 (full time equivalent) in June 2023, up about 2% since June 2022. Recruitment and job losses across the UK civil service have been uneven over the same period. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) lost more than 3,500 full-time jobs while some areas gained substantial numbers (7,000 into Home Office, 800 into Ministry of Justice outside the Prison Service).

Virtually all major areas report increases in the amount of pressure on staff, with workloads skyrocketing especially in those areas where staff numbers are in freefall. Underneath headline figures, some departments are having to continually recruit because of staff turnover, as low wages especially amongst the lowest grades of AA, AO and EO drive people to take other jobs.

Despite this, there has been little to nothing said about staffing or workload by the national leadership of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, which represents civil servants and privatised government workers, and in which all Broad Left Network supporters are members and activists. In the most recent national campaign, the most the leadership would seek was a “jobs guarantee.”

Successive Scottish Governments have granted Scottish civil servants a no-compulsory redundancies guarantee, which of course any serious union rep would welcome. But this has not protected Scottish Government staff from the pressures of workload due to understaffing. If the UK government gets away with destroying 66,000 jobs, this will diminish the funding available to Scotland under the Barnett formula.

Oppose all cuts and fight for 100,000 new civil service jobs

A united response to workload pressures and attacks on staffing is therefore required. This must be linked to the question of pay, as Jeremy Hunt’s intention to save £1 billion by attacking civil service jobs will not be the only means whereby the Tories seek to attack the “amorphous blob”, as the civil service has been described at fringe meetings with Tory cabinet ministers.

Additional savings from pay “restraint” (i.e., cuts in the pay of civil servants relative to the rising cost of living) are a favourite Tory means of clawing back the small concessions won through the £1,500 one-off, non-consolidated, pro-rata payment that most areas were paid in summer 2023, or the 4.5-5% average pay rises received by most government departments for 2023/24.

Other savings are planned by shrinking the number of government buildings (meaning longer commutes, less spending in town centres, fewer local services) and a 5% cut to all operational budgets for 2024/25. These too must be opposed vigorously by a robust industrial strategy, including strike action, by coordinating with other trade unions and by putting political pressure on MPs.

PCS has passed useful policies that lay the basis for this. Our call for 1 million climate jobs, for a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy that supports workers and communities and for energy democracy are all objectives that the entire labour movement could rally around. The Prime Minister’s decision to essentially bin net zero objectives has been met with silence by the leaders of PCS, however.

Instead of exerting political pressure on the Labour opposition, the leadership of PCS under Fran Heathcote has become all but indistinguishable from the Labour front bench. PCS fringes at Labour conference are to be addressed by such dignitaries as the head of the Trades Union Congress – no friend to workers in struggle – and Lord Coaker, a shill for Ed Miliband’s proposed MOD cuts in 2015.

Long-standing PCS policies – opposition to benefit sanctions (which Sunak has also indicated should be tougher), opposition to cuts to social security (also touted by Sunak last week), demands for tax justice that would secure thousands of highly skilled jobs in HMRC, among others – have all been cast aside by a leadership increasingly focused on one thing – their own political survival at the top of the union, which matters to them above all else.

PCS also has long-standing policy in defence of Trans rights. The last year has seen a determined Tory attack on equality policies inside the civil service, and Sunak, in the headline speech of the Conference, attacked gender self-identification, the latest in a long line of Tory retreats from the one-time commitment by Theresa May to simplify the overly medicalised process for transitioning.

Again, the leadership of PCS has been silent at best, both on the wider “war on woke” narrative that the tabloids spin and which has been a feature of a battle going on in some government departments, and on this renewed attack on Trans rights by Sunak.

There is a route to a fighting, democratic, socialist alternative in PCS

Recent developments in PCS suggest that the current leadership are not having things all their own way. As acknowledged and welcomed by the Broad Left Network steering committee at the time, a group of several dozen union reps in the PCS Revenue and Customs recently resigned from PCS Left Unity, the ruling faction of the union’s National Executive and key employer-based executives in PCS.

Their statement, now signed by around a hundred activists, and a further article published on their website after PCS Left Unity responded in typically arrogant and dismissive fashion, detailed criticisms of the lack of accountability within PCS LU itself, the undemocratic attitude of Fran Heathcote and a whole series of mistakes by PCS’ leadership over years, in respect of digitalisation, how to support the union’s different employer groups etc.

Broad Left Network supporters generally agree with many of these criticisms and many, particularly those who themselves are active in PCS Revenue and Customs Group, have signed the statement or have signalled full support directly in communication with lead R&C activists. Marion Lloyd, national chair of the Broad Left Network and General Secretary candidate, has signalled her own support.

Broad Left Network give full support to the meeting organised for Tuesday 10^th October and urge socialists in PCS Revenue and Customs Group to sign the statement and to participate fully in a comradely discussion about how to build a fighting, democratic PCS which genuinely places equality at the heart of what we do.

A further development has since emerged yesterday, on 8 October 2023, when the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) formally announced their own resignation from PCS Left Unity.

In their statement, they agree with criticisms we have consistently put forward – that the NEC seized on the first available concession and then wound down the action, that the recent all-members ballot was deliberately confusing, that any attempt to escalate strikes opposed by the leadership.

Unfortunately, the SWP fail to mention that the only consistent force to call strikes early, to call them systematically, to escalate strike action, to undertake detailed analysis on what works and what does not and opposing cancellation of the June strikes has been the Broad Left Network.

SWP members on the union’s national executive voted in favour of cancelling the June strike action. It is not entirely clear if ordinary SWP members in PCS know this, and we believe that those same NEC members have now split with the SWP over their decision to leave PCS Left Unity.

Opposition to the careerism that now runs amok at the top of PCS, and commitment to a democratic, accountable PCS run by and in the interests of the lay members of the union are powerful organising principles that have been lost by the union’s NEC. They are also the basis for a serious fightback against the coming job cuts and attacks on our pay – regardless of whether Tories or Labour hold the whip.

Marion Lloyd and the Broad Left Network remain as committed as ever to rebuilding these in PCS, and this is the basis of our principled alliance in the General Secretary and Assistant General Secretary election with John Moloney, who we urge the SWP to support. Refusal to do so is support for John’s opponent, a union full time officer who has been at the heart of the union’s timid industrial strategy and who has actively worked against the union’s democratic lay structures.

The time for change in PCS is long overdue. Please support Marion Lloyd and John Moloney in the upcoming elections, for a return to PCS as a fighting socialist trade union.

The Broad Left Network steering committee, speaking for scores of socialists and union activists within the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, welcomes the decision by dozens of reps and union activists to resign their membership of PCS Left Unity (LU).

It is clear from the statement released by an initial group of 25 reps and union activists, the vast majority of which are in Revenue and Customs (R&C) group within PCS that they are fed up with LU’s attacks on union democracy and with the deterioration of PCS Left Unity itself.

Evidently this captures something of a mood, as since the initial publication on 21 September, the number of signatories to the statement has grown to over 100 names, including a significant number of members of the R&C Group Executive Committee and many branch officers from across Revenue and Customs branches.

PCS Left Unity: a barrier to a serious national campaign

Once a campaigning, socialist organisation, PCS Left Unity has degenerated sharply to become a serious barrier to the building of an effective national campaign on pay, pensions, redundancy rights and jobs.

BLN activists, a section of whom were themselves long-standing members of PCS Left Unity, raised the question of a disaggregated strike ballot in 2018 and were denounced for it. Union President Fran Heathcote and others seized upon the excuse to have us purged from leadership roles.

Yet, in 2022, when a disaggregated ballot delivered a record vote and a mandate for action for 100,000 civil servants, there was no “mea culpa” from a leadership that had been proven wrong. Serious debate and consideration of tactics play second fiddle to a shallow triumphalism.

Unable to come up with serious-minded and strong responses on issues like Covid safety, compulsory redundancies in the civil service and the rapid rise of workloads in many areas, all too often the PCS Left Unity members of the National Executive and other leading committees have resorted to name calling and shrieked denunciation of non-PCS Left Unity members.

BLN activists therefore fully recognise the picture painted by those R&C reps and activists now resigning from PCS Left Unity – and we agree, the task now before us is to build the kind of union that we deserve, one based on the power of members, reps and branches over their workplaces and over their employers.

PCS Left Unity: also a serious threat to union democracy

As the statement by R&C group activists makes clear, LU has also become an opponent of transparency, of union democracy and of accountability of those charged with the executive authority to manage the day-to-day work of PCS as a campaigning union.

The statement highlights the recent instance of Fran Heathcote, the union’s national president, deliberately attempting to have an important motion, submitted by and about LGBT+ members of union, talked out at the 2023 Annual Delegate Conference.

PCS Left Unity’s response attempted to defend Fran Heathcote without even mentioning or explaining the text she sent, which asked activists to volunteer to speak unnecessarily, in order to get Motion A50 talked out.

Evasiveness of language has become an art-form at the top of PCS, with its sole purpose being to escape accountability of the leadership to members.

Our recent ballot on pay, organised by the PCS Left Unity majority on the union’s National Executive Committee, is surely the example par excellence. If you voted yes, the union’s pay campaign ended. If you voted no, the union’s pay campaign ended.

This ridiculous choice was set up by a leadership which realised mid-sellout that their attempt to make people swallow the £1,500 one-off non-consolidated payment as a victory wasn’t going to wash. They needed to mislead members so they could later say that calling off strike action, cancelling the re-ballots and cancelling the strike levy was what members wanted.

There are many other examples of dishonesty and abuse of power, large and small.

Internally, LU convenors have shut down meetings they knew they didn’t have a majority in, to avoid nominations or a majority of votes being cast for people out with the leadership clique.

Externally to LU, debates at the leading committees of the union are deliberately distorted so that when motions are proposed that contradict Heathcote’s view, no moving speech is permitted nor any right of reply when the usual “attack dogs” throw slurs and mud.

The PCS Left Unity response amusingly claims that the LU leadership doesn’t indulge in mudslinging. Yet time after time, Heathcote and Deputy President Martin Cavanagh chair meetings where their supporters quite happily throw every insult they can think of at those supporters of Broad Left Network who PCS members elect to the NEC or DWP GEC.

No justice is sought within the official processes of the union because the PCS Left Unity majority on the National Executive is misused whenever Rule 10 complaints are submitted: allies of the President get off lightly, opponents are not so lucky – as has been the case recently with prominent LGBT+ activist Saorsa Amatheia-Tweedale.

It is a positive step for those PCS activists now resigning from PCS Left Unity to declare that they’ve had enough and that the union deserves better.

What next?

These abuses – and many others like them – must end.

Our view is that PCS Left Unity must be forced out of power in PCS, and socialist activists and union reps must band together to build a genuinely open, democratic, campaigning PCS that fights for members and builds working class solidarity.

The view of the PCS Left Unity leadership, on the other hand, is that they bear no responsibility whatsoever and that those resigning are “hopelessly naïve” and, worse, that those now resigning do not “genuinely reflect the views of their members on the ground.”

PCS Left Unity figures frequently refer back to the defeat in the early 2000s of a genuinely right-wing leadership of PCS, and the role that LU played in it – back when it was far broader than it is today and contained much of what is today BLN, the Independent Left and those now resigning in R&C group.

That victory was so important because it ended the arrogance of a right-wing NEC that believed only they, as the chosen few, spoke for members, and that where anyone differed, they could safely be denounced as charlatans and fakers.

Every step that has been taken by Serwotka, Heathcote, Cavanagh and the others has remoulded the union’s leadership from that which led the valiant pensions dispute in 2011, that saw 2 million workers take strike action, to one much closer to the old right-wing. The high-handed, imperious and dismissive tones in which they write and speak give them away.

Captured within this article are the clear, political reasons why PCS Broad Left Network unanimously made the decision to stand a candidate in the forthcoming General Secretary election. For a democratic, inclusive trade union. For a fighting union, not the shallow, top-down, social media dominated mirage into which Heathcote et al are turning PCS.

If you want to read more about what we stand for, you can read it online. If you want to get involved, you can join us online and access activist resources online.

If you want to fight for a chance to change the union, then this needs us back in our workplaces, organising to nominate Marion Lloyd for General Secretary and John Moloney for Assistant General Secretary and then turning out the vote in the election shortly due!

The announcement of HMRC’s pay award has hammered the final nail into the coffin of the PCS NEC’s so-called pay “strategy”, rendering the outcome of the NEC’s face-saving ballot irrelevant in the process.

It has been clear since June that that the out-going General Secretary, Mark Serwotka, alongside his Left Unity NEC lackeys, believed that the Cabinet Office decision to increase the pay remit to 4.5% (in addition to awarding the controversial and non-consolidated Cost of Living Payment of £1500 for full-time staff) was sufficient to settle the pay dispute. PCS members from all factions and none overwhelmingly disagreed with this, such was the anger expressed in branch meetings, on social media and in the stage-managed PCS livestreams.

At this stage, if Left Unity truly believed that PCS is member-led, its NEC caucus would have accepted that it made a bad call and listened to PCS members, not only continuing the industrial action campaign, but also escalating it. However, despite what it says Left Unity does not believe in a member-led union – particularly so when members’ views chime with BLN demands. Instead, its response to members’ anger was to prevaricate for a number of weeks before launching a nebulous consultative ballot which has very little to do with the PCS pay campaign, but has a hell of a lot to do with Left Unity desperately scrambling for political cover ahead of the General Secretary election.

The BLN has argued throughout this pointless ballot that members should vote no, with one of the main reasons being that GECs have no capacity to push departments into meeting PCS’ 10% pay claim when departments are working within the Cabinet Office pay remit of 4.5%. PCS’ pay claim can only be met through sustained industrial action being taken throughout the Civil Service.

The DWP GEC has already rejected the DWP pay offer, meaning that a number of those same Left Unity members who voted for delegated pay bargaining at the NEC have now been forced to vote against its inevitable outcome at the DWP GEC. And now, their HMRC-based NEC comrades have been forced to do the same.

HMRC has announced the following pay award…

• 5.07% for AAs
• 6.27% for AOs
• 5.05% for Band Os
• 4.26% for HO to G6
• Non-consolidated pay for anything above the max for your grade
• Increased budget for one-off payments
• Introduction of increased pay for “critical roles”

Whilst the percentage value for each grade is about what we’d expect when working within the narrow-confines of the pay remit, the final pay award – which HMRC will impose without further discussion – is still a kick in the teeth for HMRC staff. HMRC has recognised that due to chronic low-pay, it cannot recruit into certain roles and in order to address this it will deem these roles to be “critical”, increasing the pay award for these roles in order to help recruit and retain staff.

Whilst this move is an admission by the department that pay is so poor that people simply do not want to work for HMRC, it has simultaneously diverted well-over £1m of our pay pot into its “Simply Thanks” scheme – effectively one-off non-consolidated awards, in the form of £20 shopping vouchers, that are occasionally given to PCS members who a panel has decided have went “above-and-beyond” their normal duties. This is horribly cynical – hard-pressed members should receive every penny available from the pay pot instead of being forced to do even more work for less pay, just to get a £20 voucher for Iceland.

Additionally, around 45% of HMRC staff are HO or above. This means that 45% of HMRC staff aren’t even getting the 4.5% set out in the pay remit – they’re getting 4.26%. That’s before even factoring in the non-consolidated aspect.

PCS members should direct a healthy dose of anger towards HMRC and the Cabinet Office, with a pay award which given the Cost of Living crisis can only be described as cynical and nasty. However, we should also remember that this award is a direct consequence of Left Unity NEC members’ decision to collapse PCS’ pay campaign. Indeed, in his last significant act as PCS General Secretary, Serwotka has obliterated PCS’ pay campaign in favour of a pay award which is less than half of PCS’ democratically agreed pay claim – and a pay award which in reality will see every single PCS member in HMRC receive a real-terms pay cut. This will be Serwotka’s legacy.

Whilst the BLN still urges PCS members to vote no in the NEC ballot, given the fact that PCS members in the largest two Civil Service departments have now received unacceptable pay awards, the NEC has no choice but to recommence PCS’ industrial action campaign – Left Unity cannot spin continued inaction at this stage as anything other than capitulation.

The BLN is absolutely convinced that, even after weeks of Left Unity dithering, a fresh industrial action campaign will deliver the pay rise that PCS members deserve – however based on their track record it is clear that PCS members cannot trust Left Unity to deliver. With pending elections, it now more obvious than ever that changes need to be made at the top of PCS which is why the BLN is urging all members, through their branches, to nominate Marion Lloyd for General Secretary and John Maloney for Assistant General Secretary.

Throughout this whole debacle, Marion and John have consistently argued for a continuation of PCS’ industrial action campaign in order to win the pay rise that we deserve and to avoid the consequences of Left Unity’s abject failure. If we have learned anything from this pay campaign, it is that Marion & John are the only candidates we can trust to deliver what PCS members want most – a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work.

On Monday 31 st July, a 7-page speakers brief enclosed in National Branch Bulletin BB-69-23 was emailed to all branch secretaries and all union reps across PCS. Officially from Mark Serwotka, the brief summarises the view of the majority of the union’s National Executive Committee’s (NEC) as to why people should vote yes in the ballot.

It is a staggering piece of sophistry and dishonesty. It misrepresents what the NEC have done. It misrepresents what those of us who oppose the NEC have said. It misrepresents how delegated pay bargaining works. It misrepresents what happens next in the campaign. In consequence, Broad Left Network are arguing that we must vote NO in the ballot.

So, what has the NEC done?

While the NEC seek to emphasise that “we have won significant concessions but the campaign must continue”.

First, we disagree that the concessions are as significant as the current NEC majority (a group called Democracy Alliance, made up of two factions, PCS Left Unity and PCS Democrats) are making out.

A £1,500 one-time, non-consolidated payment gets thinned down substantially by tax, national insurance contributions and for those in receipt of Universal Credit – estimated at tens of thousands across the UK civil service – will reduce any benefit entitlement.

Then we have the question of part-time staff; in the vast majority of civil service areas, the payment is being pro-rated, which means even before tax or anything else, some people are getting less, even though they’re unlikely to have a smaller mortgage or fewer bills.

Moreover, it is simply not enough when compared to inflation. Inflated prices are cumulative, adding up further and further year on year, whereas the £1,500 is one-off, paid and then forgotten, as prices continue to rise.

For most members this remains true even once Departmental pay awards are announced.

We aimed for a fully funded, 10% consolidated pay rise, with a minimum pay rate of £15 per hour, to eliminate the ridiculous situation of civil servants on the minimum wage, and a guaranteed, inflation proof increase for 2023/24. What has been gained falls dramatically short.

Second, and just as importantly, however, the NEC speakers’ brief declaring “the campaign must continue” is the kind of dishonesty we expect from Johnson, Sunak or Starmer – but not from the leadership of the union.

The campaign must continue, but we’re calling off the strikes.

The campaign must continue, but we’re calling off the re-ballots ordered by Conference.

The campaign must continue, but we’re cancelling the levy that feeds our strike fund.

The campaign must continue, but we didn’t bother submitting a revised pay claim for 2023/24 and simply relied on the previous claims, now outdated by cumulative inflation.

The campaign must continue, but they have told groups to enter departmental negotiations for 2023/4 pay within the limit imposed by Treasury but rejected by PCS Conference of 4.5- 5%.

Once all that is done, any rep is forced to ask, what campaign is left?

Reps should be aware that this stance from the NEC is utterly counterposed to the pompous and self-aggrandising manner in which Mark Serwotka moved his paper on 5th June, three days after receipt of the £1,500 offer, a paper which called off all campaigning activities.

At that meeting, Serwotka assumed the mantle of a wannabe hero, delivering from on high all that members could want. He openly spoke about the possibility of a ballot to settle the dispute, i.e., to accept the government’s offer as sufficient to end the national campaign.

Broad Left Network, Independent Left and even a small number of normally quiescent Left Unity supporters on the NEC bridled somewhat at this, and raised concerns that it was not enough and that the campaign should continue.

Nevertheless, all Left Unity supporters on the NEC voted for Serwotka’s paper, with a tiny number voting against a specific recommendation on the re-ballot in DWP, but all voting to suspend strike action. This demobilised the national campaign at a stroke.

The line that “the campaign must continue” is a recognition by the NEC majority that their position is precarious – they are at once trying to demobilise the campaign while posing as the leaders of the campaign. It is a trick stolen entirely from Napoleon in Orwell’s Animal Farm.

Cleverly, if utterly disingenuously, the NEC have recognised that “support the NEC strategy” is a line likely to be mocked in any room where the reps have a handle on what’s actually happening in the union. “Continue the national campaign” is different altogether, so they have married the two up and are utilising the mechanisms of the union to bludgeon their view through in a membership ballot, while blocking the democratic bodies of the union,
including branches and groups, from expressing legitimate dissent from the strategy.

Our hope is that all members will see clearly that you can’t “continue the campaign” by calling it off, which is what the NEC has done. We must vote AGAINST endorsing the NEC strategy. We must vote no.

What about delegated pay bargaining?

Central to the argument in the national bulletin is the view that we must pause our strikes while delegated pay bargaining begin. Essentially the NEC majority view is that it is nonsensical to be carrying out strike action when your negotiators are working out a pay deal with the employers.

Yet this ignores a crucial fact – one that is not mentioned by the national bulletin at all, almost like the NEC want reps to forget about it:

The Treasury Pay Remit cap of 4.5% (or 5% for low-waged) is still in place! Average pay rise across civil service areas must be contained under this figure.

This makes a mockery of some of the bulletin’s claims, such as how there are staff in the Home Office being offered 13%. This is true – but the bulletin doesn’t say how many relative to the entire 43,000 staff in the Home Office. The bulletin doesn’t admit that the overall Home Office pay offer will live under the Treasury cap: pay awards under this cap are robbing Peter to pay Paul, trading off inflation-proof pay rises for some against severe pay cuts for others.

When this Treasury Pay Remit was published in March 2023, the current leadership of the NEC railed against it. Now they are ordering Departmental pay negotiators into talks, and calling off strikes, without it being removed. What has changed?

The £1,500 one-time, non-consolidated, pro-rated payment is all that has changed. With this one change in place, the NEC have thrown out the demands posed by PCS Annual Delegate Conferences in 2022 and 2023.

Since the NEC have decided to use the Home Office pay award as a bit of a poster-child, it bears pointing out that thousands of PCS members’ pay awards in the Home Office will fall below the rate of inflation even when money made available under the 4.5% cap and the £1,500 one-time payment are added together.

Celebrating this as some kind of triumph is bizarre.

Our battle is not just with individual civil service employers. It is with the government, and their imposition of a Treasury Pay Remit that blocks a 10% pay rise for 2022-23 and an inflation proof pay rise for 2023/24.

We require the Treasury to be brought to the bargaining table, to cough up more money for all civil service employers. The consequences if we don’t are that, as announced recently in Ministry of Defence, job cuts will be imposed even to pay for a limited, sub-inflation pay award.

From the moment of the government’s offer, on 2 nd June, we should have called further strike action. We should have escalated by calling further national strike action. We should have re-balloted in DWP. And if the NEC had spent half the effort actually leading a determined campaign that they’ve spent trying to convince people that their naked emperor is lavishly dressed, we’d be in a vastly different position.

A strategy that can win!

The NEC argue in their bulletin that they have “made a careful analysis of the current position and considered in detail the tactical and strategic possibilities”.

Frankly we’re surprised that members of the NEC majority could spell all those big words but if you are attending a meeting, please ask them to produce this “careful analysis”.

It doesn’t exist.

Yet they have to claim this, to lend credence to their further claim that our call for the continuation of strike action “is made without any proposals on the tactics and strategy.”

Even this is dishonesty from the NEC – because we have quite clearly laid out what their strategy should have been, and what it should be now.

We must immediately launch a massive member-facing effort to whip discontent with the obvious problems with all delegated pay awards, many of which have been imposed during the months of NEC inactivity between June 5th and today. For some these awards might be sufficient – but for most they will fall significantly short.

The discontent over the pay awards, the discontent over the £1,500 one-time, non-consolidated, pro-rated payment, the discontent over the job cuts that are coming, the discontent over the continued refusal to move on our pensions and continued threat to our redundancy rights can be united with the battle over office closures into a coherent campaign based on demands already agreed by PCS Annual Delegate Conference.

We must put forward a coherent strategy that reflects genuine analysis about what is required to win our demand for a 10% pay rise for 2022/23, for an inflation proof pay rise for 2023/24 and for a £15 per hour pay floor to seriously tackle low pay in the UK civil service:

• National strike action, across all civil service employers with a mandate, at a faster pace than the three months of delay the NEC showed up until 1 st Feb 2023, and with sufficient determination to prove to members that their union is serious.
• Targeted strike action, across those areas where sustained action will resume
  pressure on the government to come to the table to bargain, not to dismissively
  throw us £1,500 and hope that this is sufficient to divide us.
• Hardship support for all branches – analysis must be undertaken of all hardship expenditures at branch level to calculate the pace at which we are spending money, compared to what action this more targeted approach allows us to deliver.
• Re-ballots in all areas where the mandate has lapsed or is lapsing, including the
  Department for Work and Pensions and Revenue and Customs Groups.
• A serious discussion, primed by an informed bulletin to all branches, on the potential impact of action short of strike action, in magnifying the industrial impact of strikes.

More can be added, and plenty of nuances exist as to how serious, socialist, campaigning reps would continue our campaign – but the reality is, had we been put in charge of PCS in the May 2023 elections, we would already have accomplished all of these, while the PCS Left Unity NEC has mostly dithered and dissembled.

They must be ousted, their continued subversion of our national campaign and our union’s democracy must be terminated. A socialist General Secretary at the head of a campaigning, democratic union could dramatically open the union up to the activist and membership base once more – which is why we are calling for all branches to nominate Marion Lloyd for GS, and to re-nominate John Moloney for Assistant GS.