National strike ballot dates set – now we organise to win

The union’s National Executive Committee has agreed to a national ballot of members for industrial action from 20 October to 1 December. The ballot for action is in support of the union’s demands on pay, jobs and conditions – demands which cannot be met by the 3.5% government imposed pay remit – only 2% of which is funded. If we want more money we will have to fight for it.

Ballot papers will be sent electronically, unless members are in Northern Ireland or do not have a valid email address.

The task now is to turn the decision into the biggest possible organising campaign across PCS and deliver the turnout and Yes vote we need to take effective national action.

BLN argued for an earlier ballot

It has been clear for some time that the government will not agree to our demands without a fight. For this reason, BLN members of the NEC have consistently argued that we should launch a ballot by 30th September, as mandated by our Conference in May. 

However, at its last meeting the NEC was belatedly told by the General Secretary that an electronic (by email) ballot could not be organised before 20 October.

Given the circumstances, we reluctantly agreed that the ballot should start on this later date.

Statutory ballot – no more delays!

The NEC rejected a proposal that PCS should first conduct a consultative ballot. Instead, the NEC agreed to go for a statutory industrial action ballot from 20 October to 1 December.

Members have already made clear the scale of the problems facing us. We do not need endless consultation while jobs, pay and conditions are under attack. We need to organise members to win an industrial action mandate capable of putting real pressure on the government.

What we are fighting for

We are campaigning on pay, jobs, pensions, hybrid working and terms and conditions.

On pay, our conference policy is for a 10% pay rise, an £18-an-hour minimum wage and appropriate London weighting. Low pay and the erosion of differentials continue to plague the civil service, with increases in the National Living Wage repeatedly catching up with the lowest civil service grades.

The government’s 3.5% Civil Service Pay Remit does not meet those demands.

We are also demanding a job security agreement, including protection against compulsory redundancies. Tens of thousands of jobs are potentially at stake. The Institute for Government estimates that around 40,000 civil service jobs could disappear by 2029 and other significant budget cuts across departments could lead to a 72,000-job loss by the end of the decade.

We are fighting for our pensions, against attacks on terms and conditions, and against arbitrary office-attendance requirements which can cost members hundreds of pounds a month simply to travel to work.

These issues are connected. Cutting jobs means greater workloads for those left behind. Low pay makes recruitment and retention harder. Arbitrary attendance requirements take still more money out of members’ pockets, and attacks on pensions and conditions amount to further attacks on our members.

The cost-of-living crisis isn’t over

The case for our cost-of-living campaign and for action is becoming stronger, not weaker.

The enormous price increases of the last few years have not disappeared simply because the rate of inflation subsequently fell. Those increases have been baked into the cost of food, housing, energy and other everyday costs. Now there are growing signs of renewed inflationary pressure – with energy prices set to increase by 13%, while council tax, water and transport costs have already risen substantially and will further increase along with housing costs. Rising prices will wipe out much, if not all of the value of the government’s pay offer – inflation is currently running at 3.1% (CPI) or 3.4% (RPI) and is certain to further increase. 

The international situation makes the outlook still more uncertain. Conflict in the Middle East has already disrupted global energy markets. Higher oil, gas, transport and industrial input costs will result in higher costs for energy, travelling to work and buying everyday goods.

Civil servants do not cause inflation. We do not cause instability in international energy markets. And we should not be expected to pay for them through falling living standards.

 Our members are already fighting

Across PCS, members are already showing that where we organise, win mandates and take action, we can fight back.

Existing disputes across the union involve jobs, office closures, restructuring, pay and working conditions.

At the V&A, for example, members delivered an overwhelming mandate, with 95.39% voting for strike action and 97.86% for action short of strike, followed by strike action in September and continuing action short of strike.

Other groups of PCS members have fought over office closures, job cuts and pay, while industrial action has already produced concrete results. At Ofgem, action contributed to securing the establishment of the Warm Homes Agency within the civil service, retaining around 1,000 jobs in the civil service and bringing a further 200 in-house.

A Wider Public Sector Fight

PCS is not alone.

Teachers in the NEU are heading into an industrial action ballot, while UCU members in further education are also being balloted.

Across the public sector the same questions are being posed: who pays for the economic crisis?

Workers face rising living costs, pressure on jobs, understaffed workplaces and deteriorating public services. At the same time, governments and employers continue to insist that pay must be restrained and public spending contained.

There is an alternative.

The millions of workers who run government departments, schools, colleges, hospitals, councils and other public services possess enormous collective power. Where different groups of workers are fighting over the same fundamental issues, the trade union movement should seek the maximum possible coordination of campaigns and industrial action. 

A strong Yes vote in PCS, alongside successful ballots elsewhere in the public sector, would strengthen every worker fighting against falling living standards – we will be discussing coordinated action capable of forcing the government to move.

Workers did not create the cost-of-living crisis and we should reject any attempt to make us pay for it.

Levy to go to members

The NEC also agreed that members will be consulted on the question of a levy to fund targeted strike action resulting from the statutory strike ballot (20th October-1st December) and for longer term requirements. The National Disputes Committee will set the dates for membership consultation.

BLN firmly believes that members should have their say on the future of the levy and how we properly resource industrial action. The central issue, however, is ensuring that PCS has the resources necessary to sustain members when we ask them to take targeted strike action.

Prepare to Smash the 50% Threshold

Getting the statutory ballot agreed is only the beginning.

Between now and 20 October, PCS needs to build organising campaigns in every branch: cleaning membership data, recruiting new members and reps, holding workplace meetings and systematically speaking to members about why they need to vote YES.

Once ballot papers land, every part of the union must be focused on beating the legal 50% turnout threshold and delivering the strongest possible “YES” vote. Branches, regions and groups should prepare targeted material aimed at the specific needs of their members. BLN members on the NEC will continue to push for reps to have the resources of the national union thrown behind them.

Prices are rising; jobs are threatened; PCS members are already fighting. Other trade unions are moving towards action.

We must prepare now for the 20th October- 1st December strike ballot and to bring the strength of the whole union into the fight.

Who benefits from a workplace fight over toilets while pay, jobs and services get hollowed out?

The Labour government is continuing with austerity and cuts which impact our communities as well as pushing through the EHRC code of practice. They bear responsibility for the anger in communities about the sorry state of our public services which results in Reform gaining support. Reform, who recently announced over £50bn in disability cuts. Reform, who have committed to repealing the Equality Act. The party whose councils it controls have banned Prides and LGBT+ education in schools. Reform, whose answer to all of society’s ills is to create even more division by attacking the most vulnerable groups.

The manufacture of a so-called culture war, in which anti-migrant and anti-trans rhetoric mutually reinforce a global rise in bigotry, serves only to fracture the solidarity among people who’d otherwise be fighting a common cause on pay, conditions, and privatisation. This highlights the common battle that we all have in fighting for race, disabilty, women’s and LGBT+ liberation as part of the fight against cuts. We have a key role in the trade union movement to unite our members against the attempts to divide us and to challenge austerity.

The fight for dignity at work is one part of the fight against capitalist austerity and Reform.

A new frontline opened across all civil service departments in July. Following the publishing of the EHRC’s latest guidance, which gained statutory status on August 5th, the Cabinet Office produced a new model policy and guidance for departments on how managers should treat Trans+ members of staff. This guidance and policy includes a bathroom ban, in which the Trans+ community may not use the bathrooms of their lived gender, and a change to departments’ special leave policy, reducing it from the current twelve weeks currently provided.

At least twelve weeks of special leave has been afforded up until now, and is absolutely necessary. To use just one example – trans women who undergo bottom surgery cannot sit for long periods for the first six weeks following surgery. For the first twelve weeks, a trans woman must dilate, which includes lying naked on the floor, inserting rods into their neovagina to ensure it does not close in on itself. This must happen multiple times a day. What government building has the facility to accommodate this?

PCS has clear policy with motion A348 carried at ADC on opposing the EHRC guidance and defending our Trans+ members’ rights. We are also challenging the discriminatory attack on special leave. It is totally unacceptable that Trans+ people would need to consciously choose between having life-saving surgery, or maintaining a positive sickness record as the Cabinet Office guidance suggests departments should instead manage gender affirming surgery under sickness policies. This is all under the guise of legal advice the Cabinet Office has received which supposedly suggests that this change is necessary to avoid claims of indirect discrimination from other protected groups such as disabled people, in so-called “preferential treatment of Trans+ people”. The PCS NEC left coalition will oppose any attacks on equality rights and will place demands on the cabinet office to improve equality conditions to meet the needs of all our members. We will challenge the current coordinated attack on our Trans+ members and the community as a whole.

One negative consequence of employers poorly implementing the toilet ban is that our disabled members will be disproportionately impacted as already scarce disabled facilities will be used by displaced Trans+ members who do not feel comfortable in or feel welcome in either gendered toilets

PCS now has a left coalition for change majority on the NEC who are committed to fighting to implement our union policies in the talks at national level with the Cabinet Office. This includes involving the Proud National Committee as the recognised LGBT+ advisory committee to the NEC in developing the union’s response. We are pressing for full support and guidance to be produced for all the negotiators across the bargaining units in the union to deal with how employers are seeking to implement the Cabinet Office guidance on the EHRC Code of Practice

This work has been frustrated by the refusal of the general secretary to carry out conference and nec decisions. https://bln.org.uk/2026/08/18/nec-agree-major-national-campaign-strategy-but-the-general-secretary-refuses-to-implement-it/

Shortly after Conference concluded and the EHRC’s guidance was published, the General Secretary suspended on union business, which prevented the NEC from carrying out the immediate actions contained in Motion A348, carried at this year’s ADC, which called on the NEC to lobby ministers and call for a full parliamentary review of the guidance. Similarly, actions have been taken by the PCS Legal Department without first consulting with Proud, as instructed in conference policy.

The left coalition NEC majority will explore all avenues to implement our union policies including all those to defend our Trans+ members overwhelmingly carried at successive ADCs. We will challenge the discriminatory attacks on the special leave policy.

As well as challenging the Cabinet Office guidance in talks and exploring all legal avenues it is essential that we mobilise the collective strength of our union to defend our Trans+ members in our workplaces. We need to promote our trans-inclusive polices across our membership and encourage our members to stand by their fellow workers and challenge any discrimination and abuse that is aimed at our Trans+ members.

It is essential that negotiators familiarise themselves with the Grainger criteria, the method by which beliefs such as those held by Gender Critical activists are considered “protected”. Not all gender critical beliefs are protected, and the manifestation of their beliefs in the form of intentional deadnaming and misgendering are certainly not protected. In the case of Mackereth vs DWP, David Mackereth’s appeal was not upheld following his sacking as he refused to follow the DWP’s policy on preferred pronouns. The court found that the DWP was correct to fire Mackereth as he breached policy. Similarly, in the case of Souza v Primark, the court found Primark liable as it did not have policies in place to protect its Trans+ staff as they were humiliated and abused.

What cases like Mackereth and Souza demonstrate is that the narrative of litigious gender critical groups being overwhelmingly successful is wrong. Having strong policy that protects Trans+ members of staff reinforces the employer’s ability to combat employment tribunal claims. Instead, the Cabinet Office may have opened the civil service to a fresh wave of claims from its Trans+ employees.

The EHRC’s guidance does not create new legal obligations, and it is not an authoritative statement of the law. Guidance for workplaces has not yet been published, so the Cabinet Office is not compelled to force through this new policy. The law matters, but only as ammunition in an argument that must be fundamentally about solidarity.

Resist the cabinet office model policy and guidance

  • Fight for a workplace built on mutual respect, not tolerance.
  • Stop changes to special leave policy.
  • Oppose the introduction of a bathroom ban for the Trans+ community.
  • Improve equality policies and terms and conditions for all our members.

Join the Broad Left Network to help us in the fight to defend our Trans+ members, improve equality rights and conditions and unite everyone in the battle again

DWP – Fight on pay, jobs and office closures!

Download leaflet here