The union’s National Executive Committee met on Wednesday 8th July. The NEC was scheduled for only 3.5 hours. Such scheduling reflects the desire by the Left Unity majority on the NEC to limit debate on their utterly inadequate approach to important questions facing members, such as on pay and Covid-19 but now also on the future of PCS itself.
As a result of this limit on time the question posed by the General Secretary at the meeting two weeks before, of merger or restructuring, including potential redundancies for PCS staff, has not been properly addressed yet. Also not taken was a motion addressing the union’s response to the Tory decision not to pursue serious reform of the Gender Recognition Act, and on the question of support for Black Lives Matters demonstrations.
Wasting time
Of the things actually discussed at the NEC, an hour and a half was spent on a paper which had only one action for agreement. This was to amend the timetable of work around the PCS pay petition. Every second speaker from the NEC majority, based in ex-left faction Left Unity, found time to repeatedly urge their fellow LU colleagues to make a five-minute contribution to the debate covering exactly the same ground as other speakers.
Elections cancelled
One of the far-reaching decisions taken at this NEC was to cancel the elections for 2020.
Elections were first suspended back in March by General Secretary Mark Serwotka and the NEC majority of Left Unity and the PCS Democrats. It is telling that when the question was first raised, the term “cancelled” was exactly what the LU majority had in mind. But under pressure from BLN members they were only suspended.
Officially, the decision in March to suspend elections was on the grounds of the Covid-19 crisis. Though the General Secretary explicitly indicated that both he and the company employed by the union to independently run the elections agreed that they were “technically deliverable”. Broad Left Network supporters opposed suspending the elections on the basis that difficulties could be sufficiently mitigated to run elections, to ensure that democracy prevails in PCS.
Since then other trade unions who suspended their elections, including Unite, one the largest in the UK, have reinstated their elections. Broad Left Network supporters argued that PCS should follow suit. At this NEC the LU majority rejected a BLN proposal to restart the PCS elections even though conceding there is no obstacle to doing so.
Why we have elections
Arguing in favour of elections is not simply demanding elections for the sake of elections. It is about ensuring that members are given a choice over who they want to lead their union. The actions of the current leadership are so far outside the union’s policies as set by Annual Delegate Conference, and are so detrimental to members, especially on questions of pay, that members need to be offered that choice of leadership at national and group level.
The decision by the LU majority on the NEC to abandon the 10% demand agreed by PCS Annual Delegate Conference in 2019, in favour of an “interim” pay demand for an “above inflation” pay rise, has completely demolished the union’s national pay campaign. The government’s offer of 1.5-2.5%, on which the top rate of 2.5% is being imposed on different government departments even at the time of writing, all but meets their “interim” pay demand given the low level of inflation.
Such utter ineptitude when it comes to negotiations with the Tory government, of demanding a ridiculously low pay award, was compounded by the union’s public announcement that it could not run a ballot during the Covid-19 crisis. The government were therefore faced by negotiators who had already announced that they couldn’t organise industrial action demanding a pay award that completely sold out the demands of union members to fix a decade of pay austerity.
No wonder Lord Agnew and the other negotiators for the Tory government refused to take the union seriously.
Without a change of leadership the union’s pay campaign will continue to be mired in the mud. No serious action has been taken since April 2019 and none seems likely this year – despite a pledge for a ballot given by LU to Conference 2019. Elections are required to put these questions before the membership for decision now not deferred until May 2021.
Left Unity’s contemptuous attitude
Scandalously, the justification Left Unity repeatedly put forward, and have now published on their website, is that there is no membership demand for elections.
The leaders of Left Unity have short memories. This was exactly the same argument put forward by the right-wing leadership of PCS under Marion Chambers and Barry Reamsbottom, when PCS was first created in the late 1990s. In opposition to annual elections, biennial elections were initially enshrined into the joint union’s constitution in 1998.
The LU majority doubled-down on this ludicrous defence by adding that they don’t think reps should be taking time off from their rep duties in order to tell members how great they are and why members should elect them. If nothing else the whole debate was instructive as to the utter contempt in which senior Left Unity figures hold union members, union democracy and the important role elections play.
Frankly, forcing leading members of the union to walk desk to desk engaging with members is a dose of reality that the NEC majority could do with.
To re-build a fighting, democratic leadership of PCS, and winning support for socialist policies – such as a pay campaign that isn’t centred around a petition and a union organising strategy that isn’t based around unaccountable decisions taken in London – are worthy tasks and elections are central to them.
No rescheduled Conference
BLN members also put forward comprehensive proposals as the basis on which an Annual Delegate Conference should be considered. This involved looking at options like a virtual or hybrid virtual/socially-distanced conference as well as the potential for a scaled-down conference organised in the same way that Special Delegate Conferences are organised, i.e. one delegate per branch.
The LU majority voted this down on the basis that they didn’t think having a Conference should be the NEC’s default position. Speaker after speaker called into question the need for a Conference and made the case for an “event”, i.e. a gathering of some kind that would not be able to make decisions binding on the leadership of the union.
TUC Motions
In the remaining 25 minutes available to the NEC, discussion turned to motions being proposed by the NEC to the Trade Union Congress, which is holding a scaled back Congress in the autumn this year.
Broad Left Network supporters proposed amendments here as well. On the motion on pay, yet again the leadership of the union put forward the demand for an “above inflation pay rise”. This rather makes a mockery of the oft-repeated view of President, Deputy President and other senior LU figures that the demand for an “above inflation pay rise” was only an “interim” demand. There was no question that the motion proposed by the NEC was calling for a coordinated campaign around an “above inflation pay rise”.
Such utter weakness, when even Unison is demanding 10% for local government workers, when Tesco has actually coughed up a 10% pay rise and when petition after petition is calling for nurses to get a 10% pay rise squanders the opportunity to build on the huge support that exists for a substantial, austerity-cancelling pay rise for key workers. All of us have faced the same attacks over the last ten years; all of us can fight to reverse these attacks.
Our specific proposal to unite unions behind the demand for a 10% was voted down, but it did force the General Secretary to agree to add “significantly” to the motion before it was submitted to the TUC, so that the demand was for a “significantly above inflation pay rise”.
The other motion being considered was on the post-Covid-19 recovery plan. On this Broad Left Network supporters on the NEC proposed an additional line that called for the taking of companies threatening redundancies or office closures into public ownership. Amusingly none of the NEC speakers who opposed the proposal could think of a serious reason to oppose it; “I’m just not minded to support it” was one penetrating contribution.
The result of this is that an opportunity to call for concrete measures which could help out British Airways workers and the many tens of thousands of others facing unemployment was lost.
Broad Left Network supporters don’t overstate the importance of this. The TUC is not going to suddenly transform into a bastion of support for workers in struggle against vicious employers and a vindictive, anti-union government based on a few motions. Every socialist, however, and LU still at least claim to be socialists, should be taking the opportunity to put pressure on the tops of the trade union movement, for them to do what they are well paid to do: to mobilise and fight for gains for the working class.
We urge all reps and members of PCS to join the Broad Left Network; it is clear in meeting after meeting that the leadership of the union do not have a plan and lack the political understanding necessary to see how our union’s fight on pay, Covid-19 and a stack of other issues must be organised. It is time for socialist change in PCS.
PCS Broad Left Network 